Page 19 of 29

Re: SOPHIA SMITH

PostPosted:Wed Sep 25, 2019 7:04 pm
by tommythehun
BobJones148 wrote:Some people are just blind. Of all the pussies i have seen, i wouldn't say hers was particualrly pretty. The reason she might keep her pubes is probably to cover, break up her less than flat low tummy. She is as average as they come and certainly not worth all this fuss over a bit of bush. Also why not look inside her if the outside pisses you off. This is a good one for that. A lovely close up pulled open then left gaping shot.
https://www.wankitnow.com/videoentry/se ... e-uniform/

Just MY opinion!


Would you say that to her face? I think not, I imagine you are also not the perfect vision of perfection either.

Re: SOPHIA SMITH

PostPosted:Wed Sep 25, 2019 8:53 pm
by Audis42
she is one of the few naturally beautiful women on here, sadly quite a few of the more recent ones have either been decidedly `chunky` or must be sponsered by dulux paint they wear.

Re: SOPHIA SMITH

PostPosted:Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:06 pm
by BobJones148
tommythehun wrote:
BobJones148 wrote:Some people are just blind. Of all the pussies i have seen, i wouldn't say hers was particualrly pretty. The reason she might keep her pubes is probably to cover, break up her less than flat low tummy. She is as average as they come and certainly not worth all this fuss over a bit of bush. Also why not look inside her if the outside pisses you off. This is a good one for that. A lovely close up pulled open then left gaping shot.
https://www.wankitnow.com/videoentry/se ... e-uniform/

Just MY opinion!


Would you say that to her face? I think not, I imagine you are also not the perfect vision of perfection either.


? I was only having an opinion because someone else did about pubes. Also i am not getting paid to get filmed telling people to wank over my cock, am i? . So i don't need to be a vision of perfection.

Re: SOPHIA SMITH

PostPosted:Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:08 pm
by BobJones148
Audis42 wrote:she is one of the few naturally beautiful women on here, sadly quite a few of the more recent ones have either been decidedly `chunky` or must be sponsered by dulux paint they wear.


She's not bad looking. Also there are more than a few decent looking women, it's just that there are so many chunkers and mingers too. :lol:

Re: SOPHIA SMITH

PostPosted:Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:42 pm
by Steph
BobJones148 wrote:
Audis42 wrote:she is one of the few naturally beautiful women on here, sadly quite a few of the more recent ones have either been decidedly `chunky` or must be sponsered by dulux paint they wear.


She's not bad looking. Also there are more than a few decent looking women, it's just that there are so many chunkers and mingers too. :lol:


Same goes for men :lol:

Re: SOPHIA SMITH

PostPosted:Wed Oct 02, 2019 8:10 pm
by tommythehun
BobJones148 wrote:
? I was only having an opinion because someone else did about pubes. Also i am not getting paid to get filmed telling people to wank over my cock, am i? . So i don't need to be a vision of perfection.


Whether you need to be a vision of perfection or not, you never answered my question. Would you make those comments to her face? Having an opinion on pubes is completely different to attacking the girls figure and what her vagina looks like. Just because she is getting paid doesnt mean she is open to such criticism or have to fit into some randoms idea of what a girl should look like. There are girls on the sites that I dont find attractive but I wouldn't dream of making such nasty comments about them.

Re: SOPHIA SMITH

PostPosted:Thu Oct 03, 2019 2:04 am
by BobJones148
tommythehun wrote:
BobJones148 wrote:
? I was only having an opinion because someone else did about pubes. Also i am not getting paid to get filmed telling people to wank over my cock, am i? . So i don't need to be a vision of perfection.


Whether you need to be a vision of perfection or not, you never answered my question. Would you make those comments to her face? Having an opinion on pubes is completely different to attacking the girls figure and what her vagina looks like. Just because she is getting paid doesnt mean she is open to such criticism or have to fit into some randoms idea of what a girl should look like. There are girls on the sites that I dont find attractive but I wouldn't dream of making such nasty comments about them.


Yes I would. Especially if she was naked and begging me for sex. :lol:

Re: SOPHIA SMITH

PostPosted:Fri Oct 04, 2019 6:14 am
by SexSlimm
BobJones148 wrote: A lovely close up pulled open then left gaping shot.
https://www.wankitnow.com/videoentry/se ... e-uniform/

Just MY opinion!

Well, it seems that she has less and less intention to show her pussy, inside or out :-(

Re: SOPHIA SMITH

PostPosted:Mon Feb 10, 2020 4:20 pm
by BobJones148
I see you are shooting Sophia this week. I was wondering what the odds were that you can shoot her shoving something inside her pussy. Doesn't matter what it is. Fingers, vegetable, a first generation Nissan Micra. Just wanna see her all filled up really. :D

Re: SOPHIA SMITH

PostPosted:Tue Feb 11, 2020 1:01 pm
by deathr0w
BobJones148 wrote:I see you are shooting Sophia this week. I was wondering what the odds were that you can shoot her shoving something inside her pussy. Doesn't matter what it is. Fingers, vegetable, a first generation Nissan Micra. Just wanna see her all filled up really. :D


Sophia has dropped her levels she's working up to nude, which is why we're only shooting her for BoppingBabes and DBJ this week.