In this thread I'm going to suggest a few of what I'll refer to from here out as "wildcards": models that are willing to do a minimum of topless level shoots, often including at least implied nude, but don't list "adult" anywhere on their profiles (either stating they will or won't do anything related to this type of work). Basically, these are women that when contacted might either send back harshly worded rejections, be excited about trying something new, or land somewhere in between; but there's no real indication in their profile of what response to expect. Since WIN covers a variety of styles, however, (clothed encouragement videos, topless stills and videos, all the way up to toys and "virtual" sex) it would seem to me that if Lee and Co. are willing to risk receiving a few more "colorfully worded" rejections here and there that these "wildcard" candidates might just supply the site with a great model or two if approached.
Anyway, here are five such "wildcards" for your consideration (as before, all links are to Purestorm unless specifically stated to be otherwise). The list will be broken up into three models in the first post and two in the second due to the link limit per message:
Chacha
Location: Birmingham
My Favorite Images: One, two, and three.
Comments: Has her own personal website that includes an additional way to contact her. On said site she lists topless as the highest level she is willing to do; however, her portfolio on Purestorm includes multiple implied nude shots (two are included above). Take from that what you will.
Margo
Location: London region (no city listed)
My Favorite Images: She only has the three on the site - One, two, and three.
Comments: She doesn't supply much information in her profile and only includes the three shots above, but she does list "Nude" in her work preferences. She also has a look that's a bit different from most on the site (shorter hair and something about her face that draws me in and seems unique even though I can't place it).
Jay
Location: Barnstaple
My Favorite Images: Headshot, rearview, and nude.
Comments: Lists that she won't do "adult/open leg" but does have the implied nude image above (picture three). Looks to be able to pull off the innocent or naughty looks as required. Seems to fit both the "natural" and "large chest" categories many of the members seem to love.
Anyway, here are five such "wildcards" for your consideration (as before, all links are to Purestorm unless specifically stated to be otherwise). The list will be broken up into three models in the first post and two in the second due to the link limit per message:
Chacha
Location: Birmingham
My Favorite Images: One, two, and three.
Comments: Has her own personal website that includes an additional way to contact her. On said site she lists topless as the highest level she is willing to do; however, her portfolio on Purestorm includes multiple implied nude shots (two are included above). Take from that what you will.
Margo
Location: London region (no city listed)
My Favorite Images: She only has the three on the site - One, two, and three.
Comments: She doesn't supply much information in her profile and only includes the three shots above, but she does list "Nude" in her work preferences. She also has a look that's a bit different from most on the site (shorter hair and something about her face that draws me in and seems unique even though I can't place it).
Jay
Location: Barnstaple
My Favorite Images: Headshot, rearview, and nude.
Comments: Lists that she won't do "adult/open leg" but does have the implied nude image above (picture three). Looks to be able to pull off the innocent or naughty looks as required. Seems to fit both the "natural" and "large chest" categories many of the members seem to love.
. Added benefit of being 34 which makes her a better candidate for more mature roles ("mum" shoots and such) than most of the current models.
