Gingerhead wrote:TOMORROW'S update on WIN will be Natalia Forrest!
'Girl at work part 2'
https://twitter.com/wankitnow/status/950772843243065344
This scene got me thinking Does anyone else think that a Fucking Machine would be a worthwhile investment?
While some models are happy to do POV sex scenes (e.g. Zoe Page) but not anything explicit or show too much (i.e. open leg), doing POV scenes while not showing anything is absolutely fine. However when models that do do explicit scenes (e.g. Natalia Forrest) and film a POV scene where nothing is shown, it really takes away from the scene in my opinion. I can only assume that this is due to the difficulty in filming such scenes with a static stunt-dildo, which I can appreciate.
It isn't so apparent when they're in a doggy position as it seems to be easier to film and actually act such a POV position, however when they're on their back with open legs it does seem like a real challenge to try and make it as good as they can and it can look unnatural. This is where I think a Fucking Machine would prove a worthwhile investment. While they may only be useful for the aforementioned kind of scenes (unless you can think of other ways to utilise one), it would makes the scenes come alive much more and allow for a wider variety of angles/ positions to be shot from both yours and the models point of view as less effort and impetus will be put on them - then you would be able to film such open leg scenes and actually pan down to see the action, rather than keeping it hidden as there is nothing happening currently.
Any thoughts?